World mythology & recorded folktales500 entries / 10 collections

The champion’s portion and competitive memory

A dispute over food becomes a public contest in which earlier injuries furnish arguments for renewed violence.

A rule proposed inside a crisis

At Mac Dathó's feast, Bricriu proposes that the boar be divided according to the warriors' deeds. The rulers accept the rule while their armies already face one another as rivals for the hound. The portion contest does not create hostility from nothing; it gives an existing competition a procedure through which each side can demand acknowledgment.

Source: Mac Datho’s Boar — Leahy translation · Mac Datho’s Boar: arrival of both armies, boar and Bricriu’s proposal

Bodies become archives of defeat

Cet defeats successive claims by recalling wounds, lost relatives, and humiliations. The challengers' own histories make his assertions difficult to deny. Conall finally counters with an even more terrible record and a severed head. Public memory here preserves suffering chiefly as competitive evidence, turning another person's disability or bereavement into a reason that he should relinquish status.

Source: Mac Datho’s Boar — Leahy translation · Mac Datho’s Boar: Cet’s series of challenges and Conall’s response

Distribution cannot repair the audience

Once Conall wins, he gives Connacht an inadequate share, and the dispute becomes a general fight. A formally decisive outcome has failed to create an acceptable social settlement. The episode invites attention to how a rule can intensify conflict when recognition is scarce and humiliation public. It remains one literary feast, not sufficient evidence for a uniform historical dining custom throughout Ireland.

Source: Mac Datho’s Boar — Leahy translation · Mac Datho’s Boar: division, Connacht’s response and outbreak of fighting

Time & the surviving record
Period / witness
Medieval Irish prose and verse preserved in medieval and early modern manuscript witnesses; Leahy translation 1905–1906.
Recording context
This entry concerns the literary version named in its passages, transmitted by Christian-era Irish manuscript culture and translated by A. H. Leahy. Legendary settings are not dates of composition or evidence for a single pre-Christian canon.

A recording location is not necessarily a story’s origin. Dates of texts, copies, and translations answer different questions.

Explore time & place →

Read the sources

These references support the explanation above. Rights and edition notes are recorded individually.

Mac Datho’s Boar — Leahy translation ↗

Anonymous Irish literary narratives; translated and arranged by Arthur Herbert Leahy (1857–1928) · Volume I, 1905; Project Gutenberg eBook released May 2004 and updated 29 June 2026

Edition & rights note